Baptism and Salvation (A Critique of Baptismal Regeneration)

 

Scope of this article:

·       It is a critique of the doctrine of baptismal regeneration and baptismal justification.

·       Mode of baptism (sprinkling, immersion) is not the scope of this article.

·       “Infant baptism or believer’s baptism?” is not the direct scope of this article.

Regeneration precedes Baptism

Consider the following passages:

Romans 8:7, 8: “For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.”

·       Those who are in the flesh cannot please God. They are at war against God (hostile to God). It cannot submit to God’s law.

·       Ask the question: Is baptism pleasing to God? Is desiring to be baptised pleasing to God? Of course it is. It is his command. Obeying it is pleasing to God. And those who are in the flesh cannot please God. Therefore, regeneration (removing the heart of stone) has to occur before baptism.

Romans 3:10, 11: “…..it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.””

·       No sinners seek for God. Not even one. No one understands the truth. Those who are in the flesh do not seek for God and His truth.

1 Corinthians 2:14: “The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.”

·       Those who are in the flesh (natural man) are not able to understand spiritual things.

Romans 7:18: “I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh.”

·       There is nothing good that dwells in a sinner.

These all passages points to a biblical and spiritual reality: a person cannot love Christ, trust Him, and obey His commandments unless they are regenerated (their nature is changed).

Those who holds to baptismal regeneration have to believe that: A spiritually dead person (who cannot please God, who does not seeks for God, who does not understand the truth) is capable of undertaking a spiritual act (baptism) that brings about their spiritual life. How does that work?

The Scripture explicitly states that God changes the heart of sinners so that (in order that) they may fear Him and obey His commandments.

Jeremiah 32:38-40: “And they shall be my people, and I will be their God. 39 I will give them one heart and one way, that they may fear me forever, for their own good and the good of their children after them. 40 I will make with them an everlasting covenant, that I will not turn away from doing good to them. And I will put the fear of me in their hearts, that they may not turn from me.”

·       It is not by fearing Him that we receive a new heart. Those who receives a new heart fears God.

Ezekiel 36:26, 27: “And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. 27 And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes and be careful to obey my rules.”

·       It is not by walking in His statutes (baptism) that we receive a new heart. Those who receives a new heart will walk in His statutes and will be baptized.

 

Therefore, regeneration precedes baptism.

Baptism is not included in Saving Faith

Don’t misunderstand me on this point. I am not saying that baptism is not related to saving faith. Baptism is related to (in fact, very closely related to) saving faith. But, the Scripture differentiates baptism and faith (believing). For example,

Acts 8:37 (KJV): “And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” (Believing is distinct from getting baptized) (See also Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38; Acts 18:8). If baptism was included in the saving faith, then these phrases would be meaningless.

Therefore, no one can say that baptism is included in the definition of saving faith. So, if anyone should say that baptism is necessary for justification, then they could not hold strictly to the doctrine of justification by “saving faith” alone. They are forced to subscribe to a view something like “justification by saving faith and baptism”. But the Scripture clearly states that faith is not only a necessary but also the sufficient condition for justification.

Faith precedes Baptism

Acts 8:37 (KJV): “And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” (A person is baptised after he/she believes in Jesus Christ)

Acts 10:43-47: “To him all the prophets bear witness that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.” 44 While Peter was still saying these things, the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word. 45 And the believers from among the circumcised who had come with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out even on the Gentiles. 46 For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God. Then Peter declared, 47 “Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?”” (Everyone who believes in Jesus Christ will receive forgiveness of sins (according to the all the prophets). Then, we read that “the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word”. That implies that all who heard the gospel believed. We can rightly assume that their sins were forgiven at the time of their belief  [because that is what the prophets prophesied]. They received the Holy Spirit before baptism. Then they were baptised.)

Acts 8:12: “But when they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.”

Acts 18:8: “Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue, believed in the Lord, together with his entire household. And many of the Corinthians hearing Paul believed and were baptized.”

 “We are justified at the very first act of genuine saving faith in Christ, and then baptism follows.”

We have seen that saving faith precedes baptism. But saving faith is not only a necessary condition for justification, it is sufficient as well. That is the testimony of the Scripture.

Romans 4:1-5: “What then shall we say was gained by Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness

Galatians 3:1-8: “O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified. Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith? [Remember: Gentiles receives the Spirit before baptism when they heard the gospel; Acts 10:43-47] Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh? Did you suffer so many things in vain—if indeed it was in vain? Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith just as Abraham “believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”? Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.” [Faith is a sufficient condition for receiving the Spirit and justification, i.e., being counted as righteous].

Our justification from sins takes place at the point (instant) of saving faith. And we have already seen that faith precedes (and is distinct from) baptism. But if a person is already justified and has sins forgiven, and has received the Spirit at the point of saving faith, then baptism is not necessary for forgiveness of sins. Therefore, justification does not take place at the point of water baptism.

Church and Salvation

If baptism were required for salvation, then no one could be saved without another party being present. Someone must be there to baptize a person before he can be saved. This effectively limits who can be saved and when he can be saved. The consequences of this doctrine, when carried to a logical conclusion, are devastating.[1] That would mean that a person’s justification depends not only on his/her faith but also on the willingness of a third person (or community).

Summary

Let me conclude this article. It was my intention to scripturally prove that regeneration, faith and justification precedes baptism. This is so clear from the Scripture.

But that does not mean that saving faith is a dead faith. I am not talking about that kind of faith. That kind of faith is good for nothing (just as James explains in his letter). Saving faith produces fruit, the fruit of obedience. It is a faith that perseveres until the end. It is a faith that trusts Jesus and love Him above all others (their parents, friends etc.).

False Doctrines:

1.     Baptismal Regeneration

2.     Justification by “saving faith + baptism”

3.     Baptism is not necessary for a Christian

 

All those who are holding to any one (or all) of the above statements are guilty of serious doctrinal error.

 

For Further Reading

(I have not delved deep into the exposition of several proof texts that are raised by proponents of baptismal regeneration (even though it is tempting to do so). It is because this article should be short. More importantly, there are many able explanations given on those texts. Some of them I am recommending for your reading):

https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/is-baptism-necessary-for-salvation

https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-Mark-16-16.html

https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-Acts-22-16.html

https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-1Peter-3-21.html

https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-Acts-2-38.html



[1] https://www.gotquestions.org/baptism-Mark-16-16.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calvinism - Introduction - Reply to Johnson C. Philip (Part 1)

Calvinism and early Brethren Movement - Reply to Johnson C. Philip (Part 2)

Calvinism and Kerala Brethren - Reply to Johnson C. Philip (Part 3)